Idle banter forum

Why? Why? Why?

  • BruceMoon

    Click here to learn more about BruceMoon
    Joined Travelfish
    27th December, 2008
    Location Australia
    Posts: 1941
    Total reviews: 6

    Why is there censorship on Travelfish?

    There are a couple of 'issues' that Stuart/somtam has indicated are 'off limits'. The ramifications on one have been widely canvassed in the SE Asian media.

    On the other, when contributors get abusive, somtam deletes part or all of the post.

    Usually, a 'trace' has been left by somtam indicating the improper or abusive post/section has been deleted/removed.

    But, recently censorship of a different kind has me baffled.

    On another post...

    http://www.travelfish.org/board/post/thailand/7520_luxury-resorts-versus-backpackers-on-ko-phi-phi

    I made a contribution on three occasions, only to find that after 10 minutes or more, it was deleted.

    In explanation...

    Many threads have 'posts' that evolve into conversations. I like many of the 'conversations'. From time to time, Stuart 'flicks' these 'conversations' into a new thread - often to Culture & Politics.

    In my case, the contribution was a repost to tezza. It was in the form of a conversation, and commented about an aspect of Travelfish. I don't believe it was offensive, or crossed boundaries previously signalled as no go.

    I accept that if a post crosses previously signalled as no go boundaries, or is offensive/abusive, decorum suggests removal.

    However, censorship is another matter.

    To me, censorship is when conversations in the public domain are removed by 'powers' because the removal aids the presence/image/perception of the 'powers'.

    This form of censorship is widely exercised in SE Asia.

    After three attempts to converse with tezza, and each removed without trace or reference, to my mind censorship is being exercised.

    What do others think of the concept of censorship? And, the application in this exemplar?

    Cheers

    #1 Posted: 11/9/2009 - 12:03

  • Advertisement

  • fondo

    Joined Travelfish
    23rd June, 2006
    Posts: 158
    Total reviews: 19
    Places visited:
    At least 98

    a) censorship is not necessarily evil
    b) probably a good idea

    #2 Posted: 11/9/2009 - 12:36

  • somtam2000

    admin
    Click here to learn more about somtam2000
    Joined Travelfish
    21st January, 2004
    Location Indonesia
    Posts: 7046
    Total reviews: 24
    Places visited:
    At least 113

    You posted something.
    I deleted it.

    You posted it again.
    I deleted it again.

    You posted a third followup suggesting censorship.
    I deleted it.

    Even Vietnamese travel agents tend to get the message after two deletions.

    I delete posts all the time -- for any number of reasons -- it is part of running a messageboard. Nobody else complains -- only you.

    I'd delete this post as well, except you'd probably just repost an even longer post that I'd just have to spend more of my time replying to.

    I don't call it censorship, I call it moderation and if you find our style unacceptable then I think you would be better served turning your time and energy into another travel forum, like Lonely Planet's Thorntree.

    I have nothing more to add in this matter.

    #3 Posted: 11/9/2009 - 13:12

  • BruceMoon

    Click here to learn more about BruceMoon
    Joined Travelfish
    27th December, 2008
    Location Australia
    Posts: 1941
    Total reviews: 6

    "Even Vietnamese travel agents tend to get the message after two deletions"

    Yes, but they are posting against your prescribed requirement that they not so do.

    "I delete posts all the time -- for any number of reasons -- it is part of running a messageboard"

    The point I made above was that where someone steps out of line, you insert a comment eg. message deleted, and sometimes even a reason.

    But, the crucial point is that you delete when someone steps out of line. To take the point further, you delete because you've set up parameters about reasonable post content.

    Censorship is when the 'power' doesn't like something and removes it. No parameters, no guidelines, just power getting above itself.

    A moderator is not a censor, a moderator is one who arbitrates. And, to arbitrate, one must refer to guidelines, or some set of rules/etc.

    Mmmmmm!!!

    #4 Posted: 11/9/2009 - 15:10

  • MADMAC

    Joined Travelfish
    6th June, 2009
    Posts: 6256
    Total reviews: 10

    Stuart
    I'm afraid I have to side with Bruce on this one. Deleting posts should not be done in a cavalier manner. And when it happens, the reason for it should be cited.

    I had this problem with Somalinet and I was one of their best and most prolific posters. When I left, others did too.

    I would say it wouldn't matter as long as you post why. If the forum had a capability to post messages to other individuals it might not be so bad. But if this is the only way to communicate with others on the forum, and you delete it for arbitrary reasons, that is very frustrating.

    Having said all that, I have not had this experience. The only thread you closed (and didn't delete) was the one on hookers in Laos... a subject that seems to worry you for reasons not completely clear to me. So that wasn't a big deal.

    #5 Posted: 11/9/2009 - 16:14

  • chrispyrolls

    Click here to learn more about chrispyrolls
    Joined Travelfish
    2nd November, 2006
    Location United Kingdom
    Posts: 198
    Total reviews: 4

    any chance of alluding to what the offending post said?... i'm intrigued

    #6 Posted: 11/9/2009 - 18:48

Have questions? Jump to our menu of forum quicklinks

This post has been locked by the moderator.