Southeast Asia forum
limited time - Laos or Cambodia?
Have questions? Jump to our menu of forum quicklinks
Add your reply
You need to be logged in to add a reply.
Not a member? you can join here.
Welcome to Travelfish, original Asia travel intelligence you can trust
Menu
dseckel
Joined Travelfish
21st May, 2008
Posts 9
Member profile
Profile private
Messaging not enabled.
Planning 2-3 weeks in September in Thailand, with a 5-6 day either Laos (Luang Prabang + either Vang Vieng or gibbonX) or Cambodia (Angor Wat / Siem Riep / Phnom Penh) – no time to do both.
Anything opinion / advice in choosing between the tourist trail in Laos vs. the tourist trail in Cambodia?
#1 Posted: 1/6/2008 - 23:07
somtam2000
admin
Joined Travelfish
21st January, 2004
Location Indonesia
Posts 6410
Member profile
Profile page
Private message
With only 5-6 days, I'd lean towards Cambodia.
If you try to see either LP and Vang Vieng or LP and GibbonX you'll be spending the bulk of your time travelling.
#2 Posted: 2/6/2008 - 14:22
somtam2000's social networks[Twitter] [Facebook] [Flickr] [Google+] [Instagram] [Pinterest]
------------------------------
Travel films for Southeast Asia
Advertisement
exacto
Joined Travelfish
12th February, 2006
Location United States
Posts 2046
Member profile
Profile page
Private message
Hmmmm. I was about to recommend choosing Laos instead of Cambodia, because I generally like Laos more than Cambodia and think you'd have a more authentic experience, particularly in a place like Luang Prabang.
But you really don't have enough time to do Laos justice, and Somtam makes a good point that with only 5 or 6 days, you might be better off picking Cambodia. Those 5 or 6 days can be split between Siem Reap/Angkor Wat and Phnom Penh nicely without feeling rushed, catching all of the highlights and quite a bit of local flavor, and still having a great time. Do that. Cheers.
#3 Posted: 3/6/2008 - 21:26
dseckel
Joined Travelfish
21st May, 2008
Posts 9
Member profile
Profile private
Messaging not enabled.
Was leaning toward Laos myself.
Only thinking Cambodia, as it seems silly to be that close to angkor Wat without seeing. On the other hand, we're not really "must see" site chasers, so thinking Laos may be a bit more laid back?
Considering flying Chiang Mai to Luang Prabang - 3 days - the 3 days combining VV & Vientiane, then fly to Bangkok...
#4 Posted: 5/6/2008 - 06:22
somtam2000
admin
Joined Travelfish
21st January, 2004
Location Indonesia
Posts 6410
Member profile
Profile page
Private message
Yes, Laos is more laid back, but the going is very slow transport wise. You're idea of flying CM-LP then overland to VTE is doable though.
Six of one, half dozen of the other. LP and Angkor are both pretty amazing places -- difficult call.
#5 Posted: 5/6/2008 - 18:56
somtam2000's social networks[Twitter] [Facebook] [Flickr] [Google+] [Instagram] [Pinterest]
------------------------------
Travel films for Southeast Asia