Cameras and travel photography forum
Wolverine Photographers Backpack: the best photography backpack ever
Purchased this Wolverine Photographers backpack last year. It holds up to 1 15.4 inch notebook in the back, 4 lenses and 2 cameras in a customizable bottom section, as well as a top sections for clothes and the like. Also holds tripod and much more. Used it on my last trip and wouldn't take anything else.
check it out here.
#1 Posted: 7/3/2009 - 08:00
25th April, 2009
Total reviews: 3
I'm looking at the same pack and was wondering if you found it too heavy to carry around once it was "loaded up"? Some of the reviews I've read have said that while it is great for packing stuff in, the problem is once it's full it's very uncomfortable to walk with for prolonged distances. I know I could just put less in, but I's prefer to go with just one one bag. Was this the only bag you took?
#2 Posted: 25/4/2009 - 11:12
Well from using the bag, if its packed full It can be heavy but the waist straps relieve much of the weight. However a female freind of mine tried using it and her being a petite 5'5 105lbs soaking wet, it was way to heavy for daily use. So i would say it is a heavy bag empty and if it has a laptop, camera, lenses etc, after a while you would start to feel the weight of it on your shoulders.
point being it fits everything a backpacker with an ear towards photography could want, however that comes with the cost of a heavy bag that gets the job done.
So if your fit and able to carry it its well worth it, but it is a heavy bag non theless.
#3 Posted: 25/4/2009 - 13:10
21st January, 2004
Total reviews: 24
At least 113
I think think87 is on the money on this. The more you put in the pack, the heavier it gets! If you're worried about how heavy it is, perhaps look at two bags -- one like the one above and a second, smaller bag that you can use for perhaps some of the camera gizmos you won't be using on a daily basis.
It does look like a good pack though -- we'll be adding a write-up on it shortly in an upcoming new bit of the Travelfish site.
#4 Posted: 25/4/2009 - 13:32
I would also like to add that the bottom padded compartment can be removed. ( see customer added photos from link in first post )
essentially making it one really big backpack with a secret laptop compartment. so even for those not going to carry a SLR camera and 3 lenses, it is still the bag i would recommend. when i bought mine they were 159.99 at amazon. with them now only 99.99, when this bag goes im going to buy another one. ( and who knows when that will be, not a single stitch is worn after a thailand and japan trip. )
all in all your paying for a high quality pack geard towards photography that will last years, not just paying for a brand name.
I have a 15.4 in laptop that fits but a 17in imho would not fit.
#5 Posted: 25/4/2009 - 22:49
Add your reply
You need to be logged in to add a reply.
Not a member? you can join here.
|Possibly related discussions||Replies||Views||Latest reply|
|To old to backpack at 50? ...||8||2425||3 Jun 2012|
|BACKPACK HELP 80l ( 70 + 10) ...||0||1671||11 Jun 2012|
|Win a backpack! ...||11||3535||23 Aug 2009|
|Which Backpack! ...||4||7647||22 Oct 2011|
|Backpack? ...||5||1134||19 Aug 2014|
|Backpack First Aid Kit ...||13||15441||22 Jul 2011|
|75 L backpack...too much or just about right?? ...||11||17531||7 May 2012|
|Backpack Help ...||2||2539||26 Jul 2009|
|What size backpack should i take to SEA ...||4||6819||23 Jan 2011|
|35- 40L backpack in wet season? ...||7||6030||30 Dec 2011|