Member profile Profile page Messaging not enabled.
any difference in terms of the 'scene' between bangkok and pattaya, other than the fact that pattaya has beaches? im wondering if i should skip pattaya since im landing in bangkok and going to travel south ending up in phuket. am i going to be missing out or is it the same as bangkok?
pattaya isn't a particularly popular destination on this site, witnessed by the fact that somtam has elected not to cover it. but it isn't without its charms either.
there is an excellent description of pattaya floating around on travelfish written by khunwilko that sums up the place perfectly. pattaya's strengths are shopping, inexpensive accommodation, and a great variety of good food. it is a serious girlie bar center, which is a plus for some and a negative for others. the beaches there are no great shakes.
if you were heading off in that general direction towards ko samet or trat or ko chang, i might say give it a look. but since you'll be heading in the opposite direction down the other side of the gulf, it doesn't really make sense to visit pattaya. almost anything that you'd be able to get in pattaya is readily available in bangkok, and the beaches will be much better almost anywhere else down south.
Member profile Profile private Messaging not enabled.
I got the impression that Jason is interested in the girls... I've said this before, but if Thailand is the Mecca of whoring, then Pattaya is the Kaba. Lot's of women, lot's of funky goings on, prices for women are cheaper than most other places in Thailand, certainly cheaper than Bangkok. If it's women you are interested in, then Pattaya is your place.
Member profile Profile private Messaging not enabled.
Phuket has better beaches than Pattaya or nearby Jomtien. If you are tight on spending money then Pattaya will be a better choice. Hotels, restaurants and transportation are cheaper in Pattaya than Phuket or Bangkok. Beach is only good for walking, sunbathing, shopping, street vendors, restaurants and bars; tourists usually use hotel pools if they want to get wet or use a beach at Jomtien. You have to take a long bus ride or fly to Phuket, then you have to take expensive taxi rides to get to your hotel. For Pattaya you take a cheap bus from Ekamai bus station (under 120 baht) and in 2 hours you are in Pattaya. You can do both Pattaya and Phuket if you want. Depends on what you want to do. Up to you!
Member profile Profile private Messaging not enabled.
Sir Halberd sums it up well. I don't like Pattaya, because there's just oo much temptation there and I want to keep things right with my wife. But if I were single... holy cow, that's the place to be.
Phuket is far pricier across the board, as our good knight points out.
I've never been to Pattaya (save for a 10 minute stop on the way to Ko Samet) but from seeing pictures and hearing stories, it sounds like the worst parts of Bangkok and elsewhere, but amplified?
I'm male, single, young, and I like to party, but it still sounds like somewhere I dont really want to go...girly bars=annoying, hookers=not interested, loads of english 'lads'=aggressive atmosphere
Maybe I'm being unfair and should stop there for a night next time, but its just like, if there are better beaches and good nightlife elsewhere, but with less sleaze, whats the point?
Member profile Profile page Messaging not enabled.
I get the feeling that a lot of people who write Pattaya off haven't actually been there. (We are too busy with the higher cultural pursuits such as the full moon party?)
Member profile Profile private Messaging not enabled.
In March my son and I had just flown in from Hanoi and had 2 nights left before flying back to europe.It was getting to the hot season so we decided to spend the last couple of days in Pattaya rather than go to a sweaty Bangkok.Neither of us had been there before even though I have been to Thailand on many occasions.Buses go there directly from the airport and take two hours which isn't much more than it takes to get into Bangkok.I expected the worse but it was OK.The shopping is excellent and I would go so far as to say you have a better choice and prices are cheaper and it's vastly preferable to an overcrowded Thai market.Everybody was really friendly and hotel and bar prices were less than Bangkok.The girls are certainly not in your face unless you want that kind of thing and go to Walking Street.(yes, we went there to take a look)All in all it's a great place to unwind if you've been travelling and you've got a bit of time to wait for your flight.Don't write it off.
No offense to anyone who lives there, but I really don't like Bangkok. I have been there about five times (sometimes for weeks).
You don't always have time to go to the southern beaches but want to relax at a beach. Pattaya might be your answer. Sure the number of hookers is similar to the number of tourists...but everyone is friendly, it's a very interesting place and pretty cheap.
Even if GO GO Bars aren't your thing, I have been there twice (once with a male friend and once with a female friend) and had a good time both times just drinking on the street/at the beach, shopping, people watching, beer bars, etc...
If you have plenty of time, def hit up the islands...but if you have only a couple of days than I agree with sayadian, Pattaya might be your best bet!
Member profile Profile private Messaging not enabled.
I've only been to Pattaya once, and it was a convenience thing as opposed to actually wanting to stay there.
It's got a few things going for it like the others said:
good/cheap shopping
good/cheap food
variety of good value hotels
great for people watching
all the girls/boys/shemales you could want including africans and blacks (of course if u are into that)
But even with me being a young man at the time, the fact that some dirty dirty looking, horribly dressed prostitutes walk around ALL day and night in places like the shopping malls and Macdonalds of all places is a bit of a turn off.
However, SOMTAM, why would you choose to not cover Pattaya, but still cover a place like PATONG?
Member profile Profile private Messaging not enabled.
"I've never been to Pattaya (save for a 10 minute stop on the way to Ko Samet) but from seeing pictures and hearing stories, it sounds like the worst parts of Bangkok and elsewhere, but amplified?"
I've heard it described as Patpong on steroids. I don't think that's exactly accurrate, but there is plenty of cheap, naughty nightlife.
Well could you imagine having to write the bar section?!
We cover Patong because it is an integral part of Phuket, and it would have looked odd if we didn't cover it. Plus it is a very popular family destination (yes I know, families go to Pattaya as well), but as (at the moment) we cover nowhere else near Pattaya it was an easier one to skip.
I think describing it as "Patong on steroids" is pretty much on the money. Some of the most bizarre stories on Thailand I've ever heard have come out of Pattaya.
Pattaya is sort of on the way to Samet and Chang, but not really, since the buses from BKK to those places typically go inland and not through Pattaya.
Pattaya isn't a major destination for the Travelfish crowd, at least based on message board activity, and it is covered pretty well on other sites, so I can understand why Travelfish spends its efforts elsewhere.
Khunwilko's write-up about Pattaya is really good too. Anyone intersted could use that as a basis.
Now, having said all that, if the only problem with covering Pattaya is finding someone to write the bar section, I bet there are a few folks out there who'd be willing to take one for the team! :-)
"Vermont is for lovers. Pattaya is for sex tourists."
"Vermont is for lovers? Well, it would not be my choice for finding a lover - that's for sure."
Wow, Vermont getting mention on Travelfish!? (This tiny state happens to be my home).
So MADMAC, what's wrong with looking for love in the Green Mountain State? Have you ever been to Burlington (also known as "Girlington"), which is where I'm writing from right now?
I, for one, would rather be here in Vermont than in Pattaya, which happens to probably be my least favorite place in Thailand I've been before - not big into the seedy thing.
I love Bangkok though, and if you are looking for what you're sure to see in Pattaya, I'm sure Pat Pong would serve just fine.
Vermont IS for lovers (and maple syrup, skiing, seeing cows, being near Canada... well, that's about it!)
Member profile Profile private Messaging not enabled.
As I said further above I've only been to Pattaya once and that was just to kill a bit of time waiting for a flight.I enjoyed it and so did my 19 year old son.A lot on here seem to look down on it because it's 'seedy'. I wonder what their definition of seedy is.
Myself, I find KhaoSan Road seedy.Full of scammers and hustlers and please don't tell me it isn't full of hookers, just open your eyes.Though saying that the majority are ladyboys.
I find Koh Samui the pits.Probably up there among the top ten seedy places on the planet.
Is it just because there are hookers in Pattaya that put off people! well people I've got news for you, they are everywhere.
Is it rowdy, noisy drunks? in that case don't go to Phuket or Koh Samui.Come on people lets have your definition of seedy.
------------------------------ money frees you from doing things you dislike,since I dislike doing nearly everything money is handy'
MADMAC
Joined Travelfish 6th June, 2009
Posts 5090
Member profile Profile private Messaging not enabled.
"Wow, Vermont getting mention on Travelfish!? (This tiny state happens to be my home).
So MADMAC, what's wrong with looking for love in the Green Mountain State? Have you ever been to Burlington (also known as "Girlington"), which is where I'm writing from right now?"
DLuek
Is Bernie Sanders still the mayor up there?
I went to Norwich University. Needless to say, I spent a lot of time in Vermont. And a beautiful place it is - but damn cold!!!
The problem with looking for love in the "Green Mountain State" is it's short of people. Lots of space, but not a lot of folks.
Burlington is nice - but a little too white for my liking. Nothing personal.
Agreed on VT being 'short on people' and too 'damn cold.' I just had to defend my home state when given the chance!
Bernie Sanders is actually a US senator now, and Burlington is getting much more diverse these days, with relatively large Vietnamese and Thai communities for one thing.
Vermont's okay, but I'm re-thinking my statement that I''d rather be here than in Pattaya. If I could be transported to Pattaya in an instant, I'd be there!
Member profile Profile private Messaging not enabled.
"I've never been to Pattaya (save for a 10 minute stop on the way to Ko Samet) but from seeing pictures and hearing stories, it sounds like the worst parts of Bangkok and elsewhere, but amplified?"
*
I come across this pretty often - "I have never been there so you should not go there!" Or "I read something, that Pattaya is no good, too dirty or something like that - so don't go there!"
"I'm male, single, young, and I like to party, but it still sounds like somewhere I dont really want to go...girly bars=annoying, hookers=not interested......"
Lots of young travelers like to head for the full moon parties at Koh Phangan; stand around navel gazing, getting wasted on dope and drinking excessively, getting hit on by aging hippies and that is supposed to be more socially acceptable than going to Pattaya?
I never had a bar girl or bar owner force me to do anything in Pattaya against my will, maybe I have more will power!
jasonkim8486
Joined Travelfish
15th September, 2009
Location United States
Posts 81
Member profile
Profile page
Messaging not enabled.
any difference in terms of the 'scene' between bangkok and pattaya, other than the fact that pattaya has beaches? im wondering if i should skip pattaya since im landing in bangkok and going to travel south ending up in phuket. am i going to be missing out or is it the same as bangkok?
#1 Posted: 22/9/2009 - 08:03
exacto
Joined Travelfish
12th February, 2006
Location United States
Posts 2050
Member profile
Profile page
Private message
pattaya isn't a particularly popular destination on this site, witnessed by the fact that somtam has elected not to cover it. but it isn't without its charms either.
there is an excellent description of pattaya floating around on travelfish written by khunwilko that sums up the place perfectly. pattaya's strengths are shopping, inexpensive accommodation, and a great variety of good food. it is a serious girlie bar center, which is a plus for some and a negative for others. the beaches there are no great shakes.
if you were heading off in that general direction towards ko samet or trat or ko chang, i might say give it a look. but since you'll be heading in the opposite direction down the other side of the gulf, it doesn't really make sense to visit pattaya. almost anything that you'd be able to get in pattaya is readily available in bangkok, and the beaches will be much better almost anywhere else down south.
#2 Posted: 22/9/2009 - 08:45
Advertisement
mattocmd
Joined Travelfish
13th June, 2007
Location United States
Posts 315
Member profile
Profile page
Private message
I agree with exacto. Your time would be better spent further south.
However, Pattaya does have some of the best people watching in the world!
#3 Posted: 22/9/2009 - 09:05
MADMAC
Joined Travelfish
6th June, 2009
Posts 5090
Member profile
Profile private
Messaging not enabled.
I got the impression that Jason is interested in the girls... I've said this before, but if Thailand is the Mecca of whoring, then Pattaya is the Kaba. Lot's of women, lot's of funky goings on, prices for women are cheaper than most other places in Thailand, certainly cheaper than Bangkok. If it's women you are interested in, then Pattaya is your place.
#4 Posted: 22/9/2009 - 11:38
------------------------------
Victory in Pattani
idreamofdur-
ian
TF writer
.JPG)
Joined Travelfish
5th September, 2008
Location Singapore
Posts 576
Member profile
Profile page
Private message
Vermont is for lovers. Pattaya is for sex tourists.
#5 Posted: 22/9/2009 - 12:36
idreamofdurian's social networks[Twitter] [Flickr]
------------------------------
idreamofdurian.com - the bloggings of a Canadian girl in Asia long-term
MADMAC
Joined Travelfish
6th June, 2009
Posts 5090
Member profile
Profile private
Messaging not enabled.
"Vermont is for lovers. Pattaya is for sex tourists."
Vermont is for lovers? Well, it would not be my choice for finding a lover - that's for sure.
#6 Posted: 22/9/2009 - 14:53
------------------------------
Victory in Pattani
sirhalberd
Joined Travelfish
30th December, 2007
Posts 291
Member profile
Profile private
Messaging not enabled.
Phuket has better beaches than Pattaya or nearby Jomtien. If you are tight on spending money then Pattaya will be a better choice. Hotels, restaurants and transportation are cheaper in Pattaya than Phuket or Bangkok. Beach is only good for walking, sunbathing, shopping, street vendors, restaurants and bars; tourists usually use hotel pools if they want to get wet or use a beach at Jomtien. You have to take a long bus ride or fly to Phuket, then you have to take expensive taxi rides to get to your hotel. For Pattaya you take a cheap bus from Ekamai bus station (under 120 baht) and in 2 hours you are in Pattaya. You can do both Pattaya and Phuket if you want. Depends on what you want to do. Up to you!
#7 Posted: 23/9/2009 - 03:56
sirhalberd
Joined Travelfish
30th December, 2007
Posts 291
Member profile
Profile private
Messaging not enabled.
"Vermont is for lovers. Pattaya is for sex tourists."
*
Yeah, especially if you are looking for a lover of the same sex!
#8 Posted: 23/9/2009 - 04:08
MADMAC
Joined Travelfish
6th June, 2009
Posts 5090
Member profile
Profile private
Messaging not enabled.
Sir Halberd sums it up well. I don't like Pattaya, because there's just oo much temptation there and I want to keep things right with my wife. But if I were single... holy cow, that's the place to be.
Phuket is far pricier across the board, as our good knight points out.
#9 Posted: 23/9/2009 - 13:07
------------------------------
Victory in Pattani
khunwilko
Joined Travelfish
27th January, 2007
Posts 560
Member profile
Profile private
Messaging not enabled.
I agree with Exacto!
#10 Posted: 23/9/2009 - 20:15
Advertisement
sidewinder
Joined Travelfish
11th April, 2009
Location United Kingdom
Posts 53
Member profile
Profile page
Private message
I've never been to Pattaya (save for a 10 minute stop on the way to Ko Samet) but from seeing pictures and hearing stories, it sounds like the worst parts of Bangkok and elsewhere, but amplified?
I'm male, single, young, and I like to party, but it still sounds like somewhere I dont really want to go...girly bars=annoying, hookers=not interested, loads of english 'lads'=aggressive atmosphere
Maybe I'm being unfair and should stop there for a night next time, but its just like, if there are better beaches and good nightlife elsewhere, but with less sleaze, whats the point?
#11 Posted: 23/9/2009 - 20:52
williamtayl-
or
Joined Travelfish
9th June, 2009
Location Japan
Posts 29
Member profile
Profile page
Messaging not enabled.
I get the feeling that a lot of people who write Pattaya off haven't actually been there. (We are too busy with the higher cultural pursuits such as the full moon party?)
#12 Posted: 23/9/2009 - 22:11
williamtaylor's social networks[Twitter]
------------------------------
My blog (Japanese)
sayadian
Joined Travelfish
15th January, 2008
Posts 1415
Member profile
Profile private
Messaging not enabled.
In March my son and I had just flown in from Hanoi and had 2 nights left before flying back to europe.It was getting to the hot season so we decided to spend the last couple of days in Pattaya rather than go to a sweaty Bangkok.Neither of us had been there before even though I have been to Thailand on many occasions.Buses go there directly from the airport and take two hours which isn't much more than it takes to get into Bangkok.I expected the worse but it was OK.The shopping is excellent and I would go so far as to say you have a better choice and prices are cheaper and it's vastly preferable to an overcrowded Thai market.Everybody was really friendly and hotel and bar prices were less than Bangkok.The girls are certainly not in your face unless you want that kind of thing and go to Walking Street.(yes, we went there to take a look)All in all it's a great place to unwind if you've been travelling and you've got a bit of time to wait for your flight.Don't write it off.
#13 Posted: 23/9/2009 - 22:45
------------------------------
money frees you from doing things you dislike,since I dislike doing nearly everything money is handy'
mattocmd
Joined Travelfish
13th June, 2007
Location United States
Posts 315
Member profile
Profile page
Private message
sayadian actually made an excellent point.
No offense to anyone who lives there, but I really don't like Bangkok. I have been there about five times (sometimes for weeks).
You don't always have time to go to the southern beaches but want to relax at a beach. Pattaya might be your answer. Sure the number of hookers is similar to the number of tourists...but everyone is friendly, it's a very interesting place and pretty cheap.
Even if GO GO Bars aren't your thing, I have been there twice (once with a male friend and once with a female friend) and had a good time both times just drinking on the street/at the beach, shopping, people watching, beer bars, etc...
If you have plenty of time, def hit up the islands...but if you have only a couple of days than I agree with sayadian, Pattaya might be your best bet!
#14 Posted: 23/9/2009 - 23:26
furneburner
Joined Travelfish
5th September, 2009
Posts 180
Member profile
Profile private
Messaging not enabled.
I've only been to Pattaya once, and it was a convenience thing as opposed to actually wanting to stay there.
It's got a few things going for it like the others said:
good/cheap shopping
good/cheap food
variety of good value hotels
great for people watching
all the girls/boys/shemales you could want including africans and blacks (of course if u are into that)
But even with me being a young man at the time, the fact that some dirty dirty looking, horribly dressed prostitutes walk around ALL day and night in places like the shopping malls and Macdonalds of all places is a bit of a turn off.
However, SOMTAM, why would you choose to not cover Pattaya, but still cover a place like PATONG?
#15 Posted: 24/9/2009 - 04:33
MADMAC
Joined Travelfish
6th June, 2009
Posts 5090
Member profile
Profile private
Messaging not enabled.
"I've never been to Pattaya (save for a 10 minute stop on the way to Ko Samet) but from seeing pictures and hearing stories, it sounds like the worst parts of Bangkok and elsewhere, but amplified?"
I've heard it described as Patpong on steroids. I don't think that's exactly accurrate, but there is plenty of cheap, naughty nightlife.
#16 Posted: 24/9/2009 - 12:30
------------------------------
Victory in Pattani
somtam2000
admin

Joined Travelfish
21st January, 2004
Location Indonesia
Posts 6416
Member profile
Profile page
Private message
Why don't we cover Pattaya?
Well could you imagine having to write the bar section?!
We cover Patong because it is an integral part of Phuket, and it would have looked odd if we didn't cover it. Plus it is a very popular family destination (yes I know, families go to Pattaya as well), but as (at the moment) we cover nowhere else near Pattaya it was an easier one to skip.
I think describing it as "Patong on steroids" is pretty much on the money. Some of the most bizarre stories on Thailand I've ever heard have come out of Pattaya.
#17 Posted: 24/9/2009 - 15:35
somtam2000's social networks[Twitter] [Facebook] [Flickr] [Google+] [Instagram] [Pinterest]
------------------------------
Travel films for Southeast Asia
furneburner
Joined Travelfish
5th September, 2009
Posts 180
Member profile
Profile private
Messaging not enabled.
Fairy nuff,
However, whilst not "near" pattaya, pattaya is kinda on the way to Samet and Koh Chang, is it not? These are covered..
Anyway, i'm not complaining, it's not like one would need a guide for pattaya and you more than make up for it for everywhere else covered!
#18 Posted: 24/9/2009 - 17:10
MADMAC
Joined Travelfish
6th June, 2009
Posts 5090
Member profile
Profile private
Messaging not enabled.
Besides anyone can just ask here on the pages. I stayed there for a week with my wife... very interesting.
#19 Posted: 24/9/2009 - 17:40
------------------------------
Victory in Pattani
exacto
Joined Travelfish
12th February, 2006
Location United States
Posts 2050
Member profile
Profile page
Private message
Pattaya is sort of on the way to Samet and Chang, but not really, since the buses from BKK to those places typically go inland and not through Pattaya.
Pattaya isn't a major destination for the Travelfish crowd, at least based on message board activity, and it is covered pretty well on other sites, so I can understand why Travelfish spends its efforts elsewhere.
Khunwilko's write-up about Pattaya is really good too. Anyone intersted could use that as a basis.
Now, having said all that, if the only problem with covering Pattaya is finding someone to write the bar section, I bet there are a few folks out there who'd be willing to take one for the team! :-)
#20 Posted: 24/9/2009 - 23:01
DLuek
TF writer
Joined Travelfish
19th June, 2008
Location Thailand
Posts 606
Member profile
Profile page
Private message
"Vermont is for lovers. Pattaya is for sex tourists."
"Vermont is for lovers? Well, it would not be my choice for finding a lover - that's for sure."
Wow, Vermont getting mention on Travelfish!? (This tiny state happens to be my home).
So MADMAC, what's wrong with looking for love in the Green Mountain State? Have you ever been to Burlington (also known as "Girlington"), which is where I'm writing from right now?
I, for one, would rather be here in Vermont than in Pattaya, which happens to probably be my least favorite place in Thailand I've been before - not big into the seedy thing.
I love Bangkok though, and if you are looking for what you're sure to see in Pattaya, I'm sure Pat Pong would serve just fine.
Vermont IS for lovers (and maple syrup, skiing, seeing cows, being near Canada... well, that's about it!)
#21 Posted: 24/9/2009 - 23:34
sayadian
Joined Travelfish
15th January, 2008
Posts 1415
Member profile
Profile private
Messaging not enabled.
As I said further above I've only been to Pattaya once and that was just to kill a bit of time waiting for a flight.I enjoyed it and so did my 19 year old son.A lot on here seem to look down on it because it's 'seedy'. I wonder what their definition of seedy is.
Myself, I find KhaoSan Road seedy.Full of scammers and hustlers and please don't tell me it isn't full of hookers, just open your eyes.Though saying that the majority are ladyboys.
I find Koh Samui the pits.Probably up there among the top ten seedy places on the planet.
Is it just because there are hookers in Pattaya that put off people! well people I've got news for you, they are everywhere.
Is it rowdy, noisy drunks? in that case don't go to Phuket or Koh Samui.Come on people lets have your definition of seedy.
#22 Posted: 25/9/2009 - 00:33
------------------------------
money frees you from doing things you dislike,since I dislike doing nearly everything money is handy'
MADMAC
Joined Travelfish
6th June, 2009
Posts 5090
Member profile
Profile private
Messaging not enabled.
"Wow, Vermont getting mention on Travelfish!? (This tiny state happens to be my home).
So MADMAC, what's wrong with looking for love in the Green Mountain State? Have you ever been to Burlington (also known as "Girlington"), which is where I'm writing from right now?"
DLuek
Is Bernie Sanders still the mayor up there?
I went to Norwich University. Needless to say, I spent a lot of time in Vermont. And a beautiful place it is - but damn cold!!!
The problem with looking for love in the "Green Mountain State" is it's short of people. Lots of space, but not a lot of folks.
Burlington is nice - but a little too white for my liking. Nothing personal.
#23 Posted: 25/9/2009 - 03:18
------------------------------
Victory in Pattani
DLuek
TF writer
Joined Travelfish
19th June, 2008
Location Thailand
Posts 606
Member profile
Profile page
Private message
MADMAC,
Agreed on VT being 'short on people' and too 'damn cold.' I just had to defend my home state when given the chance!
Bernie Sanders is actually a US senator now, and Burlington is getting much more diverse these days, with relatively large Vietnamese and Thai communities for one thing.
Vermont's okay, but I'm re-thinking my statement that I''d rather be here than in Pattaya. If I could be transported to Pattaya in an instant, I'd be there!
#24 Posted: 25/9/2009 - 06:38
sirhalberd
Joined Travelfish
30th December, 2007
Posts 291
Member profile
Profile private
Messaging not enabled.
"I've never been to Pattaya (save for a 10 minute stop on the way to Ko Samet) but from seeing pictures and hearing stories, it sounds like the worst parts of Bangkok and elsewhere, but amplified?"
*
I come across this pretty often - "I have never been there so you should not go there!" Or "I read something, that Pattaya is no good, too dirty or something like that - so don't go there!"
"I'm male, single, young, and I like to party, but it still sounds like somewhere I dont really want to go...girly bars=annoying, hookers=not interested......"
Lots of young travelers like to head for the full moon parties at Koh Phangan; stand around navel gazing, getting wasted on dope and drinking excessively, getting hit on by aging hippies and that is supposed to be more socially acceptable than going to Pattaya?
I never had a bar girl or bar owner force me to do anything in Pattaya against my will, maybe I have more will power!
Up to you!
#25 Posted: 25/9/2009 - 10:05
Tilapia
Joined Travelfish
21st April, 2006
Location Canada
Posts 1307
Member profile
Profile page
Private message
"boisterous charm"
That is such a great phrase!!!
#26 Posted: 15/10/2009 - 21:10
jasonkim8486
Joined Travelfish
15th September, 2009
Location United States
Posts 81
Member profile
Profile page
Messaging not enabled.
hehe wow amelia you sound like you work for a tour agency. great pitch but i decided on skippin pattaya.
#27 Posted: 16/10/2009 - 02:42