Gear and equipment forum

What do you look for in a good backpack?

  • somtam2000

    admin
    Click here to learn more about somtam2000
    Joined Travelfish
    21st January, 2004

    Location Indonesia
    Posts 6451

    Member profile
    Profile page
    Private message

    I've just updated the section on what to look for in a new backpack and was wondering what do you look for when you're shopping for a quality backpack?

    Got a tried and tested pack that has lasted you for many trip? Please share your advice and suggestions with others on the forum.

    In the story I've linked off to a few well-regarded backpacker manufacturers -- please feel free to name drop other brands you think should be listed.

    You can read the full backpack report here.

    Thanks!

    #1 Posted: 19/10/2008 - 08:02

    somtam2000's social networks
    [Twitter] [Facebook] [Flickr] [Google+] [Instagram] [Pinterest]

  • basho

    Click here to learn more about basho
    Joined Travelfish
    10th May, 2008

    Location United Kingdom
    Posts 24

    Member profile
    Profile page
    Messaging not enabled.

    Posted from within Vietnam.

    Arc'teryx - the best you can get. True waterproof, very tough and high tech.

    #2 Posted: 27/1/2009 - 15:05

  • Advertisement

  • TheGoose

    Joined Travelfish
    30th January, 2009

    Posts 29

    Member profile
    Profile private
    Messaging not enabled.

    Smaller the better - as long as you have your passport, you can buy anything else you may need whilst on your travels. It's worth paying more for a waterproof and sturdy backpack.

    Remember, a cheap backpack is cheap for a reason.

    #3 Posted: 5/2/2009 - 18:51

  • mattocmd

    Joined Travelfish
    13th June, 2007

    Location United States
    Posts 324

    Member profile
    Profile page
    Private message

    Never buy the ghetto cheap backpacks at the thai markets. They really suck, you can just tell by looking at them.

    My LL Bean is fantastic and everyone compliments me on it. The quality is great and the salesman will help you find one that fits properly.

    Quality is most important, but it must fit you well so that you can walk a long while in it and it doesn't cause much strain. Your back shouldn't hurt after you wear it.

    #4 Posted: 6/2/2009 - 19:50

  • wanderingcat

    Joined Travelfish
    21st October, 2006

    Posts 692

    Member profile
    Profile page
    Private message

    when you're a 5-feet-nothing girl (who can fit into a 75L backpack), helps a lot to get a one designed for smaller female frame & skeletal structure. been using a Tatonka 'Luna' for past 5 years, weight transfers pretty well to hips, stable (important when climbing) & feels like nothing on shoulders at all. pretty tough too.

    Arc'teryx is good if you can afford it.

    #5 Posted: 7/2/2009 - 08:32

  • samuel99

    Joined Travelfish
    13th February, 2009

    Posts 3

    Member profile
    Profile private
    Messaging not enabled.

    I've always made do with two bags. One a US Army style canvas sausage bag (with a home-made padded rope sling that goes nicely over the shoulder), and secondly a more traditional daypack for just wandering around town.

    I found the US Army bag really good for the following reasons:
    1) Cheap: cost about $20 at a disposal store
    2) Hardy: it's a very hardy, durable piece of work
    3) Simple: no more "damn which pocket did I put the condoms in" moment. There's only one place for everything.
    4) Antitheft: lowlifes don't seem interested in a scuffed up canvas sack, they're far more likely to go for a $300 snazzy pack

    The only negative is that it isn't really all that waterproof. It's ok in light rain, but if it pours then I need a day to dry everything out.

    Works for me.

    #6 Posted: 13/2/2009 - 10:40

  • KRStamm

    Joined Travelfish
    10th September, 2007

    Posts 35

    Member profile
    Profile private
    Messaging not enabled.

    Go get a backpack fitting at a local outdoor store. Until I did it I was always somewhat uncomfortable and now I love my pack. Since there are so many kinds of packs it is usually worth the hassle of going and talking to someone to find the perfect one for you. I usually write down the info and check the reviews via the internet. I am a big fan of Osprey packs because of the back ventilation and durability as well as numerous zippers to get in the main compartment.

    #7 Posted: 10/4/2009 - 09:38

  • SBE

    Click here to learn more about SBE
    Joined Travelfish
    14th April, 2008

    Location Global Village
    Posts 1828

    Member profile
    Profile page
    Private message

    What Somtam wrote in the "how to chose a backpack" section is very useful and like the previous posters I'd agree with most of it, but he says not to buy one that needs a cover to make it waterproof. Well, a cover also keeps the pack clean so I'd suggest you use one anyway. My old pack died this last trip after about 10 years of loyal service. Probably bunging it in the washing machine a few times had something to do with its demise, but backpacks get quite dirty after a few months on the road.

    Anyway, I had to get a new backpack in Bangkok about three months ago. I spent a day going round all the posh shops selling genuine ones and failed to find an affordable quality replacement that was lockable. Nearly all the models in the shops had drawstrings rather than zippers. The only lockable models I found cost over 300 euros, most had wheels (ie too heavy) and non of them were very comfortable to carry.

    I ended up buying one on the street ...a 50L Alpine Lowe (according to the label anyway) for 1100B. I expected it to fall apart within weeks but it hasn't. I've had it three months now and so far no problems at all! The stitching seems solid enough and the zips all still work. It's actually even more comfortable to wear than my old backpack, and has lockable zips, useful compartments and comes with a waterproof cover so it's still looking like new. I may just have been lucky, but from what I've seen so far I think it would probably be adequate for the occasional short term traveler on a tight budget.

    #8 Posted: 13/4/2009 - 15:06

  • BruceMoon

    Click here to learn more about BruceMoon
    Joined Travelfish
    27th December, 2008

    Location Australia
    Posts 1941

    Member profile
    Profile page
    Messaging not enabled.

    #9 Posted: 5/7/2009 - 05:49

  • MADMAC

    Joined Travelfish
    6th June, 2009

    Posts 5184

    Member profile
    Profile private
    Messaging not enabled.

    Samual
    You're mine kinda guy. I have two of those bags, I should start using one for my periodic trips to Bangkok.

    #10 Posted: 7/7/2009 - 18:02

  • Advertisement

  • angfonz

    Joined Travelfish
    7th July, 2009

    Posts 36

    Member profile
    Profile private
    Messaging not enabled.

    I am what I'd like to think of as "in the loop" as far as outdoor equipment is concerned. I own several high end backpacks of different capacities and have owned multiple bags from most of the top end retailers.

    With that said, REI's new Flash 65 bag is outrageously good for its price. That's a lie, its outrageously good for any price, and its cheap as hell:

    http://www.rei.com/product/778468

    #11 Posted: 8/7/2009 - 02:13

  • apm12309

    Joined Travelfish
    4th July, 2009

    Posts 1

    Member profile
    Profile private
    Messaging not enabled.

    I swear by Camelback backpacks as I am fairly active with snowboarding, dirtbike riding, hiking, etc. They have a bladder that you can drink from which is key where a lot of cities you're not supposed to drink the water. I also love that they have specialized bags for your activity and your type - I bought a women's, hiking backpack for a hiking trip and EVERYONE was jealous of my bag. A little pricey but 5 years later and it looks brand new

    #12 Posted: 8/7/2009 - 02:21

  • BruceMoon

    Click here to learn more about BruceMoon
    Joined Travelfish
    27th December, 2008

    Location Australia
    Posts 1941

    Member profile
    Profile page
    Messaging not enabled.

    To those with 65++ sized bags, how much of your gear is still untouched when you return home?

    I've asked this of many travellers along the way, and most said that when things are shoved down the bottom, they sort of get lost there. Most said that after previous journey's they'd promised themselves not to take as much. They also said that they quickly forget the weight, etc., of these packs and the hassles at airports, on buses, etc. And, they forget to pack less when starting out again.

    Which, to my mind, suggests the 65++ pack is for those serious trekkers who go away into the sticks who have to carry everything in/out ONLY, not city/beach/GH/hotel/holiday type tourist.

    Go light and enjoy life better!

    Cheers

    #13 Posted: 8/7/2009 - 09:00

  • MADMAC

    Joined Travelfish
    6th June, 2009

    Posts 5184

    Member profile
    Profile private
    Messaging not enabled.

    Camelbacks are great - but only if you're a serious hiker.

    #14 Posted: 8/7/2009 - 13:10

Have questions? Jump to our menu of forum quicklinks

Add your reply

Your reply

Check this box if you want to be notified of replies.

Please be familiar with our user guidelines before you post. Thanks!

Businesses planning on plugging their guesthouse / hotel / karaoke bar should read our "Addition guidelines" very carefully.

You need to be logged in to answer an existing post on the Travelfish forums. Please login via the prompts just above and refresh this screen -- before writing your post -- and you'll be in business.