Wat U Mong

The tunnel temple

What we say:

Set at the foot of Doi Suthep along the road leading to Wat Doi Suthep and Doi Pui village, Wat Umong is one of Chiang Mai's most unusual temples and makes a worthy addition to a day trip up the mountain.

The temple dates from around the 14th century, although it was abandoned for many years before being rejuvenated in the mid 20th century. It still has a rather overgrown and dilapidated feel with loads of trees and old Buddhist statues scattered about.

Umong means "tunnel" in Thai, and the temple is named after a series of tunnels dug centuries ago, supposedly for an eccentric hermit who apparently preferred to stay subterranean. The tunnels are now covered by a large earthen mound. Leafy trails through the nearby forest and gardens are perfect for getting back to nature, as is a small lake where you can sit and feed the fish and turtles.

Apart from the usual temple buildings there's a small meditation centre where a foreign monk gives English Dhamma talks on most Sundays from 15:00 to 18:00. It's also possible to stick around and practise meditation while taking part in the monastic routine for short or long term stays, although contacting in advance is recommended. The temple is about a 10-minute tuk tuk or motorbike ride from the old city.

More details

Tambon Suthep, Chiang Mai
http://www.watumong.org/webboard/276-%E0%B8%AB%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%82%E0%B9%89%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%98

Travelfish reader reviews

There have been no reviews written by Travelfish readers so far.
Why don't you start the ball rolling?

Have your say

Review title

Snappiness encouraged ;-)

When did you visit here?

This gives your review a bit of context - especially if you were last visited in 1932.

Your review

(Remotely sensible, non-ranting comments are much appreciated. If you don't like somewhere, please explain why -- it's all far more helpful for others that way.) Serial ranters, loons and spammers will be banished!
And please, no self-promotional URLs -- that's what your signature field is for.

So how does it rate?

On a scale of one to ten (with 10 being outstanding and 1 being bloody awful) how would you rate here?
Rating (out of 10):

Please note reviews are now pre moderated. Not all reviews will be published and submissions may be edited for clarity, typos and style before they appear. Ranting tirades, spam and anything else that really belongs somewhere else won't make the cut. If you want to rant, go to Thorntree.

Please login and refresh this screen before writing your review -- thanks!