Managing travel photos – is this possible?

A common problem we have at Travelfish is managing photos. Managing author submissions is no major issue – we use Dropbox for that – they share a folder on their laptop/desktop with us via Dropbox and we see the pics, then we pull them off and into local folders so we can use as needed.

We struggle more though with our home setup. Basically there are two Macbooks – Sam and mine – they’re not networked. Each has their own distinct photo library local to that laptop. These two libraries are organised differently — mine by location, Sam’s by a different method. This is ok when we are in range of each other’s laptops, but when one of is is away and needs a pic from the other’s machine, it is a hassle.

An ideal solution would be to mirror the image organisation system onto the two machines, and introduce a third machine, which would automatically sync with my and Sam’s machines, making a central copy of everything, plus copying images from Sam’s to mines and mine to Sam’s to fill any blanks, update with new images and so on. Essentially they’d then be three collections of the same image library, so if one of us were away, they’d still have a copy of everything the other had — at least up to the moment we went away.

We don’t want to use Dropbox or some other Cloud solution as we’re often where internet is poor and the combined gallery is about 50,000 pics.

Is the ideal situation I describe above possible? Or is there a better way?

Any suggestions much appreciated!

Request for link removal

A Saturday morning exchange with a Phuket villa operation that has been slammed by Google for dodgy link building aka spamming. Start from the bottom.

Hi,

So what you’re trying to say is something along the lines of:

“We’re sorry for spamming Travelfish in a boneheaded attempt to try and game Google. To be honest, we’re not actually sorry at all, but, as Google caught us at it and busted our chops we’re feigning sorrow. You can tell we’re not actually sorry at all as we imply in the email that Travelfish added the link themselves rather than fessing up that it was our moronic link building actions that saw it there in the first place.”

When what you really should be saying is:

“We spammed Travelfish in order to try and game Google. Google caught us. Please remove our filthy spam and we’re truly sorry for any inconvenience this caused and it most certainly will not happen again.”

Let me know

Stuart

On 3/22/14 5:43 AM, XXX wrote:
> Dear Webmaster,
>
> I am contacting you on behalf of XXX. We noticed that you
> have links to our website XXX on the following
> pages:
>
> LINK ON TRAVELFISH
>
> While we appreciate the links, we are currently attempting to recover
> from penalization by Google Penguin. I am respectfully requesting that
> you remove these links to our website, as they are no longer in line
> with our Internet marketing goals.
>
> Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions about
> removing these links.
>
> Thank You,
>
> XXX on behalf of XXX
>


Stuart McDonald

Travelfish — the website other travel writers use
http://www.travelfish.org
email: stuartmcdonald@travelfish.org

Twitter: http://twitter.com/travelfish
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/travelfish
Flickr: http://flickr.com/groups/travelfish/

We want travellers to love Southeast Asia as much as we do.

Cheap hotel in Istanbul

Very quick rant here as have to dash for P&T night, but spurned by a piece on ianditravelmedia regarding Google softening Panda stuff, I went and googled “Cheap Istanbul hotel” (note the singular).

Here’s the result:

I'm an artist at heart.

I’m an artist at heart.

The top few are, as we have come to expect, blended in ads., as is the stuff at the bottom, you know, just before the organic listings.

But in between, look at the other listings. These used to go to Google Places, which I assume Google has along with everything else rolled into +. Over half of them go to travel agents.

I Googled “hotel” not “hotels”. With a plural, yes an OTA may be a reasonable result as I’m looking for a selection, but with the singular, absolutely not.

And really, when people have come to expect “places” to be in “places” listing travel agents in a location map for a query on hotels seems well off the bat.

Think some Istanbul travel agencies are taking the piss here. Try your home town – do you get a result for a single property?